Evidence from the Clinton Trump Epstein files could set a legal precedent for the charges

Since there’s been such a firestorm over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show, maybe there’s a solution just around the corner. This compromise will satisfy both red and blue America. And the show will change the country: Have former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump testify in recess about the Epstein files.

Republicans believe former President Clinton has something to hide about Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats think the same about President Trump. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the former president and Hillary Clinton to testify about the Epstein files. After much back and forth, the Clintons will appear behind closed doors later this month.

But both Bill and Hillary Clinton now want open appointments. And Democrats believe that such an appearance in a public setting – by a former President – could set a precedent for President Trump to answer questions about what he knows about Epstein.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL TO APPEAR BEFORE HOUSE OVERVIEW COMMITTEE ON EPSTEIN PROBE

Another lawmaker pushing for the release of the Epstein files, applauded the demands last week of the former First Couple to testify in an open televised hearing. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the former president is an important witness.

“As long as [the hearing is] it’s focused on Epstein, and it’s not a wild chase — it’s not trying to score political points or embarrass President Clinton or President Trump, it’s asking legitimate questions about what they knew was going on and who they knew were engaging in wrongdoing,” Khanna said. “That should be the legitimate focus of the investigation.”

After agreeing to a closed-door hearing later this month, Hillary Clinton turned to X. He wrote to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., saying, “If you want this fight, let’s make it public.”

Former president Clinton echoed his wife the next day on X, and asked for a public hearing. The former commander-in-chief declared that he would not be used “as a prop in the closed Kangaroo Court.”

A spokesman for Comer accused the first couple of “moving the goalposts.” Comer was always open to listening. But after the installation of the closed door.

“Indictments have historically been more important than hearings,” Comer said. “Listening, unfortunately, has become a form of entertainment.”

It’s hard to track exactly what the Clintons wanted.

The House Oversight Committee voted on a bipartisan basis last August to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton — along with dozens of other prominent figures such as former Attorney General Bill Barr. After much deliberation, the committee summoned them to appear on the October dates. The Clintons oppose those. Then the committee gave them dates just before Christmas. But no one showed up at that time because of the funeral. The committee asked the Clintons to give them January appearance dates. They didn’t. The committee then gave them additional dates for January’s testimony. Skip those. That’s when Comer threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress if they didn’t show up in January. The Oversight Committee voted – in bipartisan fashion – with contempt. The House Rules Committee planned last week to work out a way to force the entire House to vote in contempt — and send criminal referrals of the Clintons to the Justice Department for prosecution after they defied subpoenas.

REVEALED: TRUMP CALLED THE POLICE CHIEF TO SUPPORT THE EPSTEIN PROBE, AND LAWYERS CALLED 6 MEN TO PROTECT THEM FROM DISCLOSURE.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., and Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., left, speaks to reporters after the impeachment trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, ex-girlfriend and former confidant of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, at the Capitol in Washington, DC, on Feb. 9, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

But the Clintons finally agreed to be replaced at the end of this month. And once that was on the calendar, the duo began calling public hearings.

There is method behind this madness. There is no loyalty among Congressional Democrats to the Clintons. In fact, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was furious with some Democrats for demanding that the Clintons appear. Younger Democrats don’t have the same respect for the Clintons as older Democrats. Hillary Clinton ran for president ten years ago. He has not been a member of parliament since 2009. He last served as Secretary of State in early 2013. President Clinton left the Oval Office more than four hundred years ago.

However, here is the gap for the Democrats:

If former President Clinton comes forward about the Epstein files, it may be difficult to make a case that President Trump should not come forward.

“It really sets a precedent. President Trump was called during the investigation on January 6th and he didn’t come in. He talked about some kind of executive privilege. And so we’re kind of forcing the Clintons to come in with the threat of criminal contempt. Then that’s the precedent we’re setting,” said Rep. Suhas Subramyam, D-Vam. “In other countries, like the UK, the Prime Minister always comes before the Parliament. So it’s not like it has never happened in the world.”

Granted, that is a parliamentary system where the prime minister is an MP in the United Kingdom. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer appears regularly on “Prime Minister’s Questions” every Wednesday at noon in London. Members of Parliament are used to asking the prime minister questions and taunting in a scene that looks like something out of Monty Python.

But the American and British systems are very different.

Finding a chairman or former President — even the first lady — before Congress is rare but not unheard of.

BONDI TO FACE HOUSE FIRE COMMITTEE OVER EPSTEIN FILES, ALLEGED CHEATING.

Former president Bill Clinton was seen in photos with Jeffrey Epstein as part of the release of the DOJ Epstein files on Friday, December 19. (Department of Justice)

There are three prominent examples of sitting Presidents appearing before Congress. President Abraham Lincoln testified voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in 1862. The New York Herald published his “State of the Union” message to Congress shortly before it was delivered to Capitol Hill. Presidents send written “reports” on those days. They did not make speeches in Congress. Lawmakers are investigating the leak of the message to Congress. It was speculated that Herald reporter Henry Wikoff received the message in advance because of his friendship with Mary Todd Lincoln. The House Sergeant at Arms briefly detained Wikoff — releasing him after the president spoke to the Judiciary Committee.

President Woodrow Wilson appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1919 to discuss a treaty with Germany and the creation of the League of Nations. Wilson’s push for a League of Nations failed. The Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

President Gerald Ford had been in office for two and a half months before he voluntarily appeared before the House Judiciary Committee in the fall of 1974. Ford told lawmakers that his pardon of former President Richard Nixon was not something they negotiated. Ford told the committee that he forgave Nixon because his physical and mental health had deteriorated.

Former President Harry Truman appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1955 to testify about the United Nations Charter.

Ford returned as former president in 1983 for a Senate hearing on the centennial of the Constitution.

And there are examples of both sitting and first women testifying, too.

Eleanor Roosevelt testified twice as first lady. As well as personnel matters. Then, about the volunteer organization of the defense organization before World War II.

Rosalynn Carter testified about mental health as first lady.

Hillary Clinton famously testified about her husband’s health care plan — though it was called (often derisively) “Hillarycare” in the fall of 1993. He testified many times as Secretary of State. Most notable in early 2013 regarding Benghazi.

Also, first lady Laura Bush was on her way to Capitol Hill to testify before a Senate panel on early childhood education after 9/11. The committee canceled hearings after the attacks on New York and the Pentagon.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS PROGRAM

So, many Republicans are game to hear from the Clintons about the Epstein files. In fact, some were more interested in appearing to scorn them than to dig up anything about Epstein. But it looks like the Clintons will at least stick around to file in a few weeks. Whether or not there is a hearing is unclear. Some Republicans may push for that. But caveat emptor. The Clintons’ open session will only intensify the pressure on Democrats – and some GOPers – to hear from President Trump.

Their testimony may not come in time for the Super Bowl halftime show. But open testimony by a former President and a sitting President could be the Super Bowl of politics.